Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix

[Florian Schulze]

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:42:19 +0100 (BST), Kieran Mansley <address@hidden> 
wrote:

> Interesting.  I've been looking at the checksum code today too, and
> wondering about ways to make it faster.  I expect most of those would
> break some architectures too.  Maybe we should move the checksum code 
> into
> an architecture specific place in the source tree, and keep a
> generic-should-work-on-most implementation (ie. the one there is
> already) as the default.  Anyone got opinions on this?

Maybe it should be similar to the network interfaces. One example 
implementation for reference and then maybe optimized versions (assembler) 
in the architecture directories.

Regards,
Florian Schulze