[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Math-papers with lout?
From: |
Oliver Bandel |
Subject: |
Math-papers with lout? |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Apr 2016 13:06:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Horde Application Framework 5 |
Hello,
are there any mathematicians who use lout for their papers?
Or are they rather use LaTeX?
The question came to my mind because of some symbols I needed
and did not found in lout-docs.
For example the sets of natural, rational, real, complex numbers
normally have certain symbols.
One could possibly use @Sym Rfraktur for the real numbers
(which works, btw. even though @Sym nu did not work),
but thats rather a workaround.
And there is no Cfraktu, no Qfraktur, ...
One could use Outöine maybe... but that looks different to
what is used normally.
Looks like a workaround (and it is one).
So, how to get math papers appear close to the stuff, one
can produce with LaTeX?
Ciao,
Oliver
P.S.: My workaround for |R / real numbers so far:
{ @Outline @R R }
which looks like a candidate for a macro-definition...
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Math-papers with lout?,
Oliver Bandel <=