Re: bug: postscript page numbering comments on blank pages

[slomium]

Jeff,

Thanks.  I have no understanding of lout internals, so I didn't know if a fix 
would be possible.  Lout does seem willing to assign a correct label in the 
introductory contents pages, just not in the body of the book document.  Why 
should the contents (with Roman numerals) behave differently than the body of 
the book?

In any event, your proposed fix sounds like it will do the trick.

Thanks again,

Dave
> I'll see what I can do about these ? page labels.  I don't think
> I can convince Lout that those blank pages really and truly have
> numbers, but I can heuristically replace ? by previous_num + 1
> if there is a previous_num.  That should plug the hole.
> 
> Jeff Kingston
>