[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latin 2 problem
From: |
Jeff Kingston |
Subject: |
Re: Latin 2 problem |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:00:48 +1000 |
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:38:08 +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 14:05:14 +0200, Michael Piotrowski wrote:
>
> > > There seems to be one letter I can't get in my latin2 documents. I
> > > think it's eth. The letter should look like a 'd' with a short
> > > horizontal line through the top part of the vertical line. Right now
> > > I'm getting a similar but not quite right symbol. I could put pictures
> > > somewhere on the web if someone is interested.
> >
> > I guess you're getting eth, but you really want dcroat (in some fonts
> > it's called dbar); while the uppercase letters Eth and Dcroat look
> > identical, the lowercase letters are quite different. Lout's
> > LtLatin2.LCM encoding contains eth instead of dcroat, so you first
> > would have to change this.
>
> Yes, the correct glyph names according to Adobe's glyph list are
> Dcroat/dcroat - the should be fixed.
>
> PS: Marko, have you submitted your Croatian data to Jeff?
>
> SY, Uwe
> --
> address@hidden | Zu Grunde kommen
> http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen
I've substituted dcroat for both occurrences of eth, and Dcroat for
both occurrences of Eth, in LtLatin2.LCM for the next release. I hope
I don't now hear from irate eth users - what will I do then?
Jeff