[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout
From: |
Alex Povolotsky |
Subject: |
Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Mar 1999 08:31:47 +0300 |
<address@hidden>Jeff Kingston writes:
>I'm the author of Lout and I'm applying for promotion. As
>part of my application I need to convince the committee
>that Lout is a good thing and that it has had an impact.
>
>Rather than delving into the technical issues, these
>committees look for evidence that other people value
>whatever it is. In the case of Lout this could be
Well, it is the best postscript preparing solution I've found so far. It
doesn't have any real problems with Cyrillic, it's reasonably fast, quite
handy and excellently documented.
When I'll find enough time to make SGML-lout glue, it will be complete ;-)
Alex.
--
Alexander B. Povolotsky [ICQ 18277558]
[2:5020/145] [http://freebsd.svib.ru] address@hidden
[Urgent messages: 234-9696 аб.#35442 or address@hidden
- evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Jeff Kingston, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, David Oxilia, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, John Keith Hohm, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Chip Salzenberg, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Chip Salzenberg, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout,
Alex Povolotsky <=
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Daren Scot Wilson, 1999/03/25
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Wolfram Kahl, 1999/03/25
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Dale Arntson, 1999/03/25