Re: [lmi] XML sorting

[Greg Chicares]

On 2017-08-27 14:04, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 13:48:21 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]> GC> We do need to retain
> GC>   {multiple,single}_cell_document::validate_with_xsd_schema()
> GC>   {multiple,single}_cell_document::cell_sorter()
> 
>  Yes, I did see this when I was wondering, in the beginning of this
> project, whether we needed to keep using libxslt at all (libxml itself is
> used in more places, e.g. for the configuration settings, so there is no
> question of removing dependency on it, but I hoped to get rid of this one).

Sadly, we must keep libxslt for this sole reason.

> GC> and I suspect that means we must also keep 'ledger_xsl.?pp'...
> 
>  Sorry again if I'm missing something obvious, but why do you think this?

I just figured that
  (A) we need libxslt for 'sort_cell_subelements.xsl', and
  (B) 'ledger_xsl.?pp' is lmi's interface to libxslt, so
  (C) therefore we need 'ledger_xsl.?pp'.
But apparently (B) is not true, so (C) does not follow.