[lmi-commits] [6017] Explain why certain defect markers will soon be removed

[Greg Chicares]

Revision: 6017
          http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=lmi&revision=6017
Author:   chicares
Date:     2014-11-01 22:28:35 +0000 (Sat, 01 Nov 2014)
Log Message:
-----------
Explain why certain defect markers will soon be removed

Modified Paths:
--------------
    lmi/trunk/census_view.cpp

Modified: lmi/trunk/census_view.cpp
===================================================================
--- lmi/trunk/census_view.cpp   2014-11-01 21:57:09 UTC (rev 6016)
+++ lmi/trunk/census_view.cpp   2014-11-01 22:28:35 UTC (rev 6017)
@@ -1025,6 +1025,11 @@
 //    else
 //        create: copy from first matching individual
 // TODO ?? and if unmatching element in class array: delete it?
+// ^ Remove comment block. The first defect marker seems to ask
+// whether it's necessary to have default parameters for each class.
+// The other asks whether parameters for a class to which no cell
+// belongs should be deleted. The answer to both is affirmative.
+// The code below takes care of both.
 
     // Rebuild vector of class parameters so that it contains
     // an element for each class in use.