[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lmi-commits] [5074] Remove duplicative defect markers
From: |
Greg Chicares |
Subject: |
[lmi-commits] [5074] Remove duplicative defect markers |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:33:13 +0000 |
Revision: 5074
http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=lmi&revision=5074
Author: chicares
Date: 2010-07-27 13:33:13 +0000 (Tue, 27 Jul 2010)
Log Message:
-----------
Remove duplicative defect markers
Modified Paths:
--------------
lmi/trunk/input_harmonization.cpp
Modified: lmi/trunk/input_harmonization.cpp
===================================================================
--- lmi/trunk/input_harmonization.cpp 2010-07-27 13:32:35 UTC (rev 5073)
+++ lmi/trunk/input_harmonization.cpp 2010-07-27 13:33:13 UTC (rev 5074)
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
RetireesCanEnroll.enable(database_->Query(DB_AllowRetirees));
- // TODO ?? There should be flags in the database to allow or
+ // TODO ?? DATABASE !! There should be flags in the database to allow or
// forbid paramedical and nonmedical underwriting; arbitrarily,
// until they are added, those options are always inhibited.
GroupUnderwritingType.allow(mce_medical, database_->Query(DB_AllowFullUw));
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@
IndividualPaymentToAge .enable(mce_to_age ==
IndividualPaymentToAlternative);
IndividualPaymentToDuration.enable(mce_to_year ==
IndividualPaymentToAlternative);
-// InsuredPremiumTableNumber.enable(mce_pmt_table ==
IndividualPaymentStrategy); // TODO ?? Not yet implemented.
+// InsuredPremiumTableNumber.enable(mce_pmt_table ==
IndividualPaymentStrategy); // // INPUT !! Obsolete scalar alternative control.
// In the legacy system, that control, 'InsuredPremiumTableFactor',
// and their 'Corporation'- congeners were enabled iff a
// 'mce_pmt_table' strategy was selected in a scalar control--but
@@ -682,7 +682,7 @@
InputFundManagementFee.enable(mce_yes == OverrideFundManagementFee ||
mce_fund_override == FundChoiceType);
-// TODO ?? WX PORT !! There seems to be some confusion here. We seem to have
+// TODO ?? WX PORT !! There seems to be some confusion here. We have
// checkboxes 'OverrideFundManagementFee' and 'UseAverageOfAllFunds'
// that duplicate enumerative control 'FundChoiceType'.
//
@@ -834,7 +834,7 @@
&& (
mce_pmt_input_scalar == IndividualPaymentStrategy
)
-// TODO ?? WX PORT !! There is no employer payment strategy.
+// INPUT !! Obsolete scalar alternative control.
// && (
// mce_pmt_input_scalar == ErPmtStrategy
// )
@@ -1303,8 +1303,8 @@
{
if(0 < local_rep->WDBegTime)
// TODO ?? ( IssueAge + local_rep->WDBegTime
-// TODO ?? < database_->Query(DB_MaturityAge)
-// TODO ?? )
+// < database_->Query(DB_MaturityAge)
+// )
{
s += "0, " + value_cast<std::string>(local_rep->WDBegTime);
s += "; ";
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [lmi-commits] [5074] Remove duplicative defect markers,
Greg Chicares <=