--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user EFAULT implementation |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:09:20 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I confirm that I expected g2h() to be completely removed in case the Linux
user access API is used.
I agree too that it should not be used. I'm testing ARM on x86_64, and
used it in a few places to clean up some warnings. The real fix is to
change what I was doing to not need this asignment anyway. I will take
another look at how to bury this part in the copy* interfaces.
Would it be OK to use g2h() inside the implementation of copy* ?
Since you agree for the copying interface, I suggest to convert all the code
to it.
OK, I'll continue in this direction, after taking a fresh look at what I
did yesterday.
Thanks for the feedback.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson address@hidden
Solutions Architect http://www.c2.net/
1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
confirm 901e97fd05668648dba62b9b5c087a16f5015c80 |
If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message. Do this if the message is
spam. If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list. The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.
--- End Message ---