linphone-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Linphone-users] Fwd: Re: [redhat.com #1263208] Linphone on the inte


From: Simon Morlat
Subject: Re: [Linphone-users] Fwd: Re: [redhat.com #1263208] Linphone on the internal RH SIP
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:54:55 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.30-1-amd64; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; )

My fault, my fix was buggy. I should better have gone to bed. The new code 
wasn't executed in case of 404.
I've pushed a new commit (f33093e82b140d98b4f0739a79369be5d0a3eff3), can you 
please retry ?

Simon

Le mardi 1 septembre 2009 23:47:16, Matěj Cepl a écrit :
> Dne 1.9.2009 21:59, Simon Morlat napsal(a):
> > I just pushed to svn and git a possible workaround: it restarts the
> > register with the real local address as seen by the server, after the 404
> > failure. So the expected behaviour should be first the same 404 error,
> > then a second register going to the server, but this time with correct
> > contact information.
> >
> > Unfortunately I have no server on my hands to test with for this use
> > case. At least I could verify this patch does not break the behaviour for
> > the main case.
> >
> > Can you do the test and send me back the log in case of failure again ?
>
> Not sure what's wrong, but I don't see any difference. The last message
> of the log is
>
> commit d0fe2ae5e394889a09635dc8f5eae2ad7e5e3754
> Author: smorlat <address@hidden>
> Date:   Tue Sep 1 19:55:36 2009 +0000
>
>      retry a register after a failure, if the contact was not up to date
> (incorre
>
>      git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/linphone/address@hidden
> 3f6dc0c8-dd
>
> (and git diff HEAD^1 is attached just to be sure I have the same code as
> you have)
>
> Matěj





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]