[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Linphone-developers] Initializing linphonec daemon in -V mode via l

From: Henrik Pauli
Subject: Re: [Linphone-developers] Initializing linphonec daemon in -V mode via linphonecsh
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:49:50 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1

Still no feedback on the matter and 3.6.1 is already out and shell.c still untouched :|

Guillaume? Anyone?

On 06/03/13 11:11, Henrik Pauli wrote:
Guys, any chance of getting this patch in before you finish the next version?

For me, it's useful because it allows me to specify config file on command line.

2012.09.28. 12:31 keltezéssel, Henrik Pauli írta:
This still seems to be the case with Linphone 3.5.2, so I made a patch
which hopefully doesn't leak and fixes the issue under Windows. I'm not
a C programmer, so there might be things that are awkward in this code.
  It compiles fine under mingw for me even after the changes.

Simon Brenner wrote:
Hi everyone,

maybe this is the appropriate list for this issue...

I found that in console/shell.c in function "spawn_linphonec" no use
is made of
the user-given
arguments (char *argv[]). At least this seems to be true for the #else
part of
this "#ifndef WIN32"
paragraph. In the linux paragraph the user arguments are forwarded to
the new

Am I right??


Julian Krien wrote:
> Hello,
> i am wondering if it is possible to initialize linphonec daemon in
> mode (-V) via linphonecsh.
> I am running linphone 3.3.1 on Windows 7.
> help for linphonecsh tells me that arguments for linephonec should
> follow init action, but it seems argument -V has no effect.
> ==================================
> Usage:
> linphonecsh <action> [arguments]
> where action is one of
> init : spawn a linphonec daemon (first step to make
> other actions)
>                         followed by the arguments sent to linphonec
> ==================================
> i tried "linphonecsh init -V" , but i am only able to make audio
> thanks in advance.
> Julian

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]