[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Linphone-developers] nat traversal
From: |
Simon Morlat |
Subject: |
Re: [Linphone-developers] nat traversal |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:16:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
Hi strk,
Which version ?
Maybe the stun response takes too long to get back, thus linphone decides to
send the register with the local address.
Can you include a full log with lastest cvs version (if the problem still
produces) ?
You need lastest libosip2-3.0.x and libeXosip2-3.0.x tar balls from
http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/osip/
http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/exosip/
Thanks
Simon
Le Saturday 14 July 2007 07:19:23 strk, vous avez écrit :
> I'm trying to use linphone with FWD but I can't seem to receive
> a call with the "call me" service they offer.
>
> Looking at the logfile I see the REGISTER message is formed as such
>
> REGISTER sip:fwd.pulver.com SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.111:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK1898441686
> ...
> Contact: <sip:address@hidden:5060>
>
> No, should the 'Contact' line contain my *public* IP rather then
> the private one ? The only place in which I see the public one
> is in the response:
>
> SIP/2.0 100 Trying
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 192.168.1.111:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK1898441686;received=<PUBLIC_IP_
>HERE>
>
> Is this enough or am I missing something ?
> Note that I have use_nat=1, use_stun=1 and stun_server=stunserver.org
> Also, port 5060 (both TCP and UDP) is forwarded.
>
> Anything I'm missing here ?
>
> --strk;
>
> () ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> /\ Keep it simple!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linphone-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers