Re: WARNING: SPAM / MALWARE being sent to list members

[Richard Shann]

specifically, if you get an email with a name you recognize check the
email address is the one that person usually uses (mine purported to
come from Jean-Abou but the email address was spurious).
Richard
On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 12:01 -0400, Rik Kabel wrote:
> The following turd was sent to me this morning. I have removed the
> link so that it is not accidentally activated.
> The email source is full of faked headers.
> Be careful about what you open and click on.
> -- 
>  Rik
> 
>  
>  -------- Forwarded Message -------- 
> >  
> > Subject:    Re: Where did the \header number go?
> > Date:       Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:15:20 -0600
> > From:       Panix <odnjr1o8@wakiclearing.com>
> > To: rik@panix.com
> > 
> >  
> >  
> > Check document: SPAM LINK REMOVED
> > 
> > On 8/20/2023 11:35 AM, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> >   
> > Le dimanche 20 août 2023 à 10:54 -0400, Rik Kabel a écrit :
> > Hello list,
> > I have a few pieces that have been engraved for my choir with
> > 2.18.10 that include catalog numbers entered as
> >  
> > \header {
> >    ...
> >    number = \markup { \fontsize #4 \sans \ellipse 11B }
> >    ...
> >  }
> > The number variable seems to be gone with current versions, and I
> > can find no mention of the change.
> > Has another feature taken its place?
> > 
> > 
> > I could not see any effect of adding number = "foo" to a \header
> > block in 2.18.0, and I did not find any trace of this in the source
> > code of that version either?
> > 
> > Maybe you redefined a title using one of the xxxTitleMarkup
> > variables, and you used \fromproperty #'header:number there?
> > 
> > Or maybe you're just confusing this with the 'opus' variable?
> > 
> > Sorry for the noise.
> > The number was set in a bookTitleMarkup block in the paper
> > definition.