[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dynamics placement in partCombine
From: |
Michael Gerdau |
Subject: |
Re: Dynamics placement in partCombine |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15:38:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
Quick answer, and I’m not sure it will help much:
\dynamicUp affects the context (Voice) in which it’s placed.
\partCombine combines its arguments into new Voices and \dynamicUp
ended up in a different voice than the p
Thank you for your answer.
When you remove \dynamicUp ALL dynamics appear below. What irritates me
is that when you have identical dynamic markings in both voices
\dynamicUp and things like \override DynamicTextSpanner.style = #'none
work normally. However when voices have differing dynamics it stops to
work at some point.
Might be due to the temporary contexts created by \partCombine
internally. The current behaviour is very unexpected to me though.
The following seems to work:
- snip - snip - snip - snip - snip - snip -
\version "2.25.9"
musa = { \dynamicUp c'4\p \repeat unfold 3 { c' }
\dynamicUp c'4\p \repeat unfold 3 { c' }
c'4\p \repeat unfold 3 { c' } }
musb = { \dynamicUp s1
\dynamicUp c'4\p \repeat unfold 3 { c' }
c'4\p \repeat unfold 3 { c' } }
\score {
\partCombine \musa \musb
}
\score {
\partCombine \musb \musa
}
\score {
\partCombine \musa \musa
}
\score {
\partCombine \musb \musb
}
- snip - snip - snip - snip - snip - snip -
Kind regards,
Michael--
Michael Gerdau email: mgd@qata.de
GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
partCombine-Test.ly
Description: Text document
partCombine-Test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document