|
From: | Rip _Mus |
Subject: | Re: Question about condensed score |
Date: | Fri, 18 Aug 2023 19:03:39 +0200 |
Good morning everyone,going back to the solution written by David, I found that simply adding the Duration_line_engraver causes the example to fail to compile.Can anyone tell me why this happens?Below is the minimal example:%%%global = {s1\breaks1\breaks1}flOne = \relative c' {e1r1e1}flTwo = \relative c' {c1r1c1}\new StaffGroup \with { \consists "Keep_alive_together_engraver" }<<\new Staff \with {\RemoveAllEmptyStaves\override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer = 1instrumentName = "Flute 1"shortInstrumentName = "Fl. 1"} <<\global \flOne>>\new Staff \with {\RemoveAllEmptyStaves\override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer = 1instrumentName = "Flute 2"shortInstrumentName = "Fl. 2"} <<\global \flTwo>>\new Staff \with {instrumentName = "Flutes"shortInstrumentName = "Fl. 1-2"\override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer = 2} \partCombine \flOne \flTwo>>\layout {\context {\Voice\consists "Duration_line_engraver"}}%%%Il giorno lun 14 ago 2023 alle ore 21:24 David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> ha scritto:Rip _Mus <ripetizioni.musica@gmail.com> writes:
> wow!!
> Now I understand Knute's answer too.
> Unfortunately, opening the page in the Italian version, the documentation
> relating to the Keep_alive_together_engraver is not there.
Its internals are documented, but its remove-layer settings are not
really documented as a user-level feature. Part of the reason is that
there should actually be a user-level layer of commands around the core
settings, and _that_ should then get user-level documentation.
But the skeleton of the feature can be made to walk without being
fleshed out.
> Thank you very much for the solution, thank you very much!
Well, it is more embarrassing than anything. But occasionally I do
catch questions for that functionality.
--
David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |