Re: bare time signature rendering difference

[Nate]

Thanks - my output included no such warning.

(lyluatex)      Compiling score tmp-ly/51d5af77a942f28ac1f5986a0ab47d35 with LilyPond executable 'lilypond'.

Module lyluatex Warning: The score doesn't contain any music:
(lyluatex)               this will probably cause bad output. on input line 8vim
(./ts.aux))
 431 words of node memory still in use:
   3 hlist, 1 vlist, 1 rule, 2 glue, 3 kern, 1 glyph, 6 attribute, 50 glue_spec
, 6 attribute_list, 2 write, 1 pdf_colorstack nodes
   avail lists: 2:10,3:1,4:1,5:4,7:1,9:1

warning  (pdf backend): no pages of output.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 1:12 AM Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:

> I seem to have some sort of platform difference between my desktop
> and laptop computers.  I'm rendering a bare time signature and tempo
> in a LaTeX table using lyluatex.
>
> The snippet: [...]
>
>   {
>     \new RhythmicStaff \with {\remove "Staff_symbol_engraver"}
>     { \time 6/8 \numericTimeSignature \tempo 4=120 }
>   }
>
> [...] fails to render any output:
>
> Module lyluatex Warning: The score doesn't contain any music:
> (lyluatex)               this will probably cause bad output
>
> Is this properly formatted code?

Apparently your two computers use different LilyPond versions: recent
versions complain with

```
Warning: skipping zero-duration score
Warning: to suppress this, consider adding a spacer rest
```

If you do what the warning suggests, the snippet compiles again:

```
\new RhythmicStaff \with {\remove "Staff_symbol_engraver"}
{ \time 6/8 \numericTimeSignature \tempo 4=120 s }
```


    Werner