[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Discourse proposal status

From: Valentin Petzel
Subject: Re: Discourse proposal status
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:20:17 +0100

But that is exactly my point. A system that does require much more resources 
to set up is  a bit fishy in my eyes.

Also my point still stands: 

As far as I see discourse uses docker containers for deployment. Wouldn’t it 
be possible to set up the container on a local machine, export the set up 
container and load that on the server, which I believe is more or less what 
David enquired about.

Setting everything up on a local server might also be a good idea before 
spending money just to try out how it works.


Am Montag, 6. März 2023, 03:29:43 CET schrieb Andrew Bernard:
> No. You misunderstand. Discourse is quite compact. The 8GB of RAM is
> only required temporarily for importing 20+ years worth of mbox files.
> My Discourse servers all run fine in 2GB of RAM, with unlimited posts,
> which are just in a database on disk.
> On 6/03/2023 3:04 am, Valentin Petzel wrote:
> > I suppose a system that requires by a large factor more resources for
> > installation that it requires to run is not really a good way to do it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]