Re: Avoid double beaming

[Valentin Petzel]

Hello Jogchum,

you will see that \partCombine does make very basic decisions, so often you 
will find yourself in need to manually intervene (often this is not a question 
about adding slurs to each voice). In case you want to force a particular 
behaviour use one of the commands

\partCombineApart
\partCombineChords
\partCombineUnisono
\partCombineSoloI
\partCombineSoloII

in any of the two combined voices or \partCombineAutomatic to switch back to 
automatic decision. Here’s a little demonstration how this looks:

\partCombine
{
  \time 6/8
  e'8 d' c' d'8. e'16 f'8 |
  e' s e' d' s d'
}
{
  c'8 c' c' c' c' c' |
  c' c' c' c' c' c'
}

\partCombine
{
  \time 6/8
  \partCombineApart
  e'8 d' c'
  d'8. e'16 f'8 |
  \partCombineChords
  e' s e' d' s d'
}
{
  c'8 c' c' c' c' c' |
  c' c' c' c' c' c'
}

Cheers,
Valentin

Am Montag, 20. Februar 2023, 15:18:32 CET schrieb Jogchum Reitsma:
> Op 20-02-2023 om 12:24 schreef Xavier Scheuer:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 12:15, Jogchum Reitsma <j.reitsma@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> > > This gives the result I would like to see (well, almost: the first
> > 
> > bar still has separated stems/beams, but that's nitpicking).
> > 
> > > I applied it to the piece the snippet was an excerpt from, and it
> > 
> > renders beautifully.
> > 
> > > Thanks a lot!
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > The first bar will have the stems/beams combined if you add the slur
> > in both sopranoOne and sopranoTwo, as I did in the code I sent in my
> > previous message.
> 
> Ah! I oversaw that, and indeed now also the first bar is OK. Thanks again!
> 
> > (Actually one could add the \p in sopranoTwo as well, if the dynamics
> > are exactly the same in sopranoOne and sopranoTwo they will only
> > appear once in the combined version.)
> 
> Dynamics are the same in both lines. Entered them in both lines, and it
> went as you predicted. Learned again something(s)!
> 
> regards, Jogchum
> 
> > Cheers,
> > Xavier

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.