[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of OpenLilyLib
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
Re: Future of OpenLilyLib |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2022 22:33:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 |
Le 21/11/2022 à 21:55, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
cf. our past discussions (some on -devel, some private) about my attempts to
add code, where it should go, etc.
=)
Yes, I remember that :-)
2. Obviously I use oll-core, since that is foundational to the EE.
Note: oll-core is a somewhat haphazard bag of stuff, some of
which is useful, some of which has already been integrated
to LilyPond (like ly:version?, added by Urs himself), and
some of which ... cough, doesn't make a lot of sense to me
(options, property sets and presets). There are things to
“clean out” there too.
Best,
Jean
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Future of OpenLilyLib, Mark Knoop, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Mark Knoop, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/11/21
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib,
Jean Abou Samra <=
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Mark Knoop, 2022/11/22
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Andrew Bernard, 2022/11/22
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Valentin Petzel, 2022/11/22
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Graham King, 2022/11/23
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/23
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Federico Bruni, 2022/11/23
- Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Graham King, 2022/11/23
Re: Future of OpenLilyLib, Valentin Petzel, 2022/11/21