[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CPU stress tests for LilyPond
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: CPU stress tests for LilyPond |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:56:26 +0100 |
So, to illustrate the idea of using the benchmark at the list below, it might
be the Mac mini (Late 2020) with single-core score 1712 and the other Macs of
this year have a similar performance. It gives for the iMac 2008 used a
single-core score 372 (depending on model), and it took 4–5 minutes to compile
the same example. Then 1712/407 = 4.6, and dividing 4 minutes with that gives
53 seconds, and this ignores speedups in lilypond self, but it seems one can
get a rough idea of performance this way.
https://browser.geekbench.com/mac-benchmarks
> On 30 Nov 2021, at 16:36, Jacques Menu <imj-muzhic@bluewin.ch> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is what I get for this 102 page score:
>
> jacquesmenu@macmini > time lilypond MSDM.ly
> GNU LilyPond 2.22.1
> ;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
> ;;; or pass the --no-auto-compile argument to disable.
> … … … …
> real 0m39.590s
> user 0m37.119s
> sys 0m2.285s
>
> jacquesmenu@macmini > ls -sal MSDM.*
> 8 -rw-------@ 1 jacquesmenu staff 2695 Nov 17 2016 MSDM.ly
> 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 jacquesmenu staff 42641 Nov 30 16:32 MSDM.mid
> 1888 -rw-r--r-- 1 jacquesmenu staff 963019 Nov 30 16:32 MSDM.pdf
>
> The machine is a Mac Mini M1, 8GB RAM, 256 GB disk.
>
> JM
>
>> Le 30 nov. 2021 à 15:28, Hans Åberg <haberg-1@telia.com> a écrit :
>>
>>
>>> On 30 Nov 2021, at 14:26, Paolo Prete <paolopr976@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I need to buy a new PC, more powerful than the one I own. The CPU and RAM
>>> must be chosen on the time required to produce LilyPond output. Are there
>>> any test sheets with different CPUs and the time they take to output a
>>> score that takes a long time to compile? In case this doesn't exist
>>> specifically for LilyPond, is there anything equivalent I can use?
>>
>> There are general benchmarks, like those below, maybe the single core ones
>> can be useful.
>>
>> https://browser.geekbench.com
>> https://browser.geekbench.com/mac-benchmarks
>>
>>
>>
>