[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink? |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:22:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Valentin Petzel <valentin@petzel.at> writes:
> Hm, I might have misunderstood Harm, I thought he was looking for a way to
> actually determine the printed area of an arbitrary stencil.
>
> Still, I expect that this functionality cannot be easily used here due to
> design and order of it.
That's why I wrote that I consider it likely to need some amount of C++
code in lily/stencil-integral.cc and lily/stencil-interpret.cc just like
my implementation of \with-outline did.
That was the gist of my first response which you considered
ill-informed.
--
David Kastrup
- markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Thomas Morley, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/21