[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Articulation mark & slur placement
From: |
Knute Snortum |
Subject: |
Re: Articulation mark & slur placement |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Dec 2020 17:16:25 -0800 |
Is this maybe what you're looking for?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/learning/outside_002dstaff-objects
--
Knute Snortum
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 4:59 PM Mark Stephen Mrotek
<carsonmark@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Mike
>
> Any requirement that the marcato to be below the note?
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lilypond-user
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr.com@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
> Michael Seifert
> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2020 3:10 PM
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Articulation mark & slur placement
>
> The following code
>
> \relative c' {
> d4-^( e4 f4-.) r4
> }
>
> produces a slur with all articulation marks “inside” the slur. Typically,
> however, articulation marks are supposed to go “outside” the first note of a
> slur: “Usually, only tenuto lines and staccato marks may go inside of the
> first and the last notes of a slur.” (“Behind Bars”, p. 121) If we follow
> this guideline in the excerpt above, the endpoint of the slur should be
> closer to the notehead than the marcato accent is. The staccato mark, on the
> other hand, is correctly placed.
>
> Is there a way to make it so that the “usual” placement occurs by default?
> Or do I need to tweak this manually for each articulation mark (other than
> staccato and tenuto) that begins a phrase?
>
> Mike Seifert
>
>