Re: PDF not shown in Frescobaldi

[Federico Bruni]

On Tue, 16 Jun, 2020 at 14:54, Noeck <noeck.marburg@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 16.06.20 um 14:13 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> >  IMO Frescobaldi package should not have lilypond as dependency
>
> To be more precise: frescobaldi "recommends" and "enhances" lilypond.
> But with default apt settings that means, installing frescobaldi will
> install lilypond, too.

"recommends" makes sense, absolutely.

In Fedora there's the concept of weak dependency, but I think it was 
introduced a few years ago.
Currently in Fedora lilypond is a hard dependency of frescobaldi:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/frescobaldi/blob/master/f/frescobaldi.spec#_23

I think I opened an issue in Fedora/Red Hat tracker some time ago, but 
I cannot find it anymore.