[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues |
|
Date: |
Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:00:51 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Aaron Hill <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2019-12-13 3:54 am, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Peter <address@hidden> writes:
>>> A regular oddity is the message no glyph for U+92 in the .off file ?
>>> significant?
>> It means that in the given font there is no backslash. Text font
>> layout
>> of TeX fonts tends to be a bit weird but nevertheless this seems
>> strange.
>
> pango-font.cc emits the warning with %0X, so that U+ number is in hex.
>
> U+0092 (Private Use Two) is a control character from Latin-1
> Supplement. But I would suspect this was meant to be character 0x92
> from a non-Unicode code page, possibly Windows code page 1252 which
> equates to U+2019 (0x92): Right Single Quotation Mark.
Ah, ok, sorry for the decimality.
--
David Kastrup