[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fingering

From: Stephan Schöll
Subject: Re: fingering
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 11:23:07 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

Despite of my newbie status on the list, let me ask back:

What's your intention with separating dynamics, the notes and the

If the separation is only for displaying purposes in a specific staff, I
would simply remove the corresponding engravers from the voice
      \remove "Dynamic_engraver"
      \remove "Fingering_engraver"

Just my 2 cents ;-)
Cheers, Stephan

Am 06.05.2019 um 10:41 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
> I normally enter fingering instruction using the "note-digit" convention
> (
> like this:
>     \version "2.21.0"
>     {a4-1 b-2 c'-3 d'-4}
> This way of proceeding it's in my opinion the easiest and less error
> prone because you see clearly the note where the fingering is applied.
> But when I finished to enter the fingering, I would definitely prefer
> having the fingering instruction separated by the music. Something like
> this (NB: it does not work correctly but I hope the idea is clear):
>     \version "2.21.0"
>     myMusic = {a4 b c' d'}
>     myFing = {s4-1 s-2 s-3 s-4}
>     <<    \myMusic \myFing >>
> Now the question: Does exist any Frescobaldi snippet to make this
> operation, that means: it takes the music with fingering and it copy the
> fingering and the note in two different variable (or something similar)?
> The same would make sense also for dynamics.
> Thank you, g.
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]