Am Fr., 4. Jan. 2019 um 11:17 Uhr schrieb Gianmaria Lari
<address@hidden>:
>
> My apologies, I didn't specify the fact that it is 3/4 time.
>
> Thomas solution is graphically perfect....
Well, my suggestion meets the image. Actually, the composers notation
is simply wrong, strictly speaking.
I've seen it many times, though.
Yes it's wrong but I think it is used because it better complies with the need to be easy to write it and to be less "dense" (and then someway easier to read) than traditional/correct way. Maybe the composer could add a small footnote but in my (not expert) opinion it is a very good solution. For example I found ugly and "difficult" to read the bass part of the BWV846 (c major prelude).
> but I have to manage the midi output "manually ".
I don't care much about midi, why do you do? It's never music.
For didactical reason. And for that, it is pretty important.
[...]For the record, one could do:
\layout { \context { \Voice \remove Slur_engraver } }
\new Staff \with { \consists Slur_engraver }
{
\key aes \major
\clef bass
\time 3/4
<<
aes,2.\=7( \\ { s4 ees2 } \\ s2. \\ { s2 bes4\=7) }
>>
}
This has serious drawbacks, you'll not happy using it...
What's the equal sign? never saw before.
What's about this?