[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Syntax
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Syntax |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jul 2018 23:00:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
> 2018-07-05 22:48 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>
>> Seen the issue, but by the way, it's also "hihat" in our definitions.
>
> True, otoh we have highfloortom and hightom ..
Ugh. I still vote for just the doc change for now.
--
David Kastrup
- Syntax, **********, 2018/07/05
- Re: Syntax, Thomas Morley, 2018/07/05
- Re: Syntax, Urs Liska, 2018/07/05
- Message not available
- Re: Syntax, Thomas Morley, 2018/07/05
- Re: Syntax, David Kastrup, 2018/07/05
- Re: Syntax, Thomas Morley, 2018/07/05
- Re: Syntax, David Kastrup, 2018/07/05
- Re: Syntax, Thomas Morley, 2018/07/05
- Re: Syntax,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Syntax, **********, 2018/07/05