|
From: | Craig Dabelstein |
Subject: | Re: Opinions requested on deprecating "annotation" commands |
Date: | Sun, 1 Jul 2018 08:04:28 +1000 |
On 30.06.2018 14:14, Urs Liska wrote:
> # Encourage people to use the new system and "deprecate" the old syntax
> (but leave it alone and working). The downside is that the *names* of
> the old commands are very much what one would want, so I wouldn't want
> to discard them completely.
> # Make the old names wrappers around the new technology, so one can
> still say \criticalRemark.
I’d vote for the latter. Better to make a clean cut, and there’s so much
potential in this, and the number of users seems to be limited until now
in my perspective – I may be wrong.
Best, Simon
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |