[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scheme with Frescobaldi
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: scheme with Frescobaldi |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:36:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Aaron Hill <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2018-06-27 08:14, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>> On 26.06.2018 03:02, Aaron Hill wrote:
>>> Here is the reference on `let` for Guile:
>>>
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Local-Bindings.html#Local-Bindings
>>
>> I guess for the time being we should stick with the Guile 1.8 manual:
>> <https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-1.8/guile-ref/Local-Bindings.html#Local-Bindings>
>
> Ah, sorry about that. The new docs are always what shows up in a web
> search, and I forgot to manually adjust for the older version of Guile
> that LilyPond uses. That said, I doubt the concept of `let` has
> changed all that much since 1958. ;)
Since 1958, named let has been added. Also let* and letrec .
--
David Kastrup
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, (continued)
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Urs Liska, 2018/06/25
- Message not available
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Urs Liska, 2018/06/25
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Freeman Gilmore, 2018/06/25
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Aaron Hill, 2018/06/25
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Freeman Gilmore, 2018/06/25
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Andrew Bernard, 2018/06/26
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Urs Liska, 2018/06/26
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Freeman Gilmore, 2018/06/26
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Simon Albrecht, 2018/06/27
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Aaron Hill, 2018/06/27
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Urs Liska, 2018/06/26
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Freeman Gilmore, 2018/06/27
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Urs Liska, 2018/06/27
- Re: scheme with Frescobaldi, Freeman Gilmore, 2018/06/27