[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Repeat question
From: |
Torsten Hämmerle |
Subject: |
Re: Repeat question |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:34:13 -0700 (MST) |
Ok, when looking at the XML data, I'll have to admit that Finale, Musescore
and Sibelius (just tested it) are closer to the XML reality, whereas
LilyPond fills in missing parts.
Import into Sibelius:
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t3887/sibelius-xml-repeat.png>
But I think there's a
<repeat direction="backward"/>
missing in the XML file at the end of measure 2 (within <barline…>)
If you insert this, the missing repeat barline between the volta brackets
will even show up in Finale/Sibelius/MuseScore. ;)
And when even specifying
<type>whole</type>
within <note>, MuseScore will correctly import semibreve notes instead of
crotchets plus rests.
All the best,
Torsten
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
- Repeat question, Menu Jacques, 2018/06/25
- Re: Repeat question, Torsten Hämmerle, 2018/06/25
- Re: Repeat question, Jacques Menu Muzhic, 2018/06/25
- Re: Repeat question,
Torsten Hämmerle <=
- Re: Repeat question, David Wright, 2018/06/26
- Re: Repeat question, Jacques Menu Muzhic, 2018/06/26
- Re: Repeat question, David Wright, 2018/06/27
- Re: Repeat question, Jacques Menu Muzhic, 2018/06/28
- Re: Repeat question, Jacques Menu Muzhic, 2018/06/28
- Re: Repeat question, David Wright, 2018/06/28
- Re: Repeat question, Jacques Menu Muzhic, 2018/06/28
- Re: Repeat question, David Wright, 2018/06/28