[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:39:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Karlin High <address@hidden> writes:
> On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer!
>> Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does.
>
> The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or
> something?
I think the term is "anathema".
--
David Kastrup
- Form of multi-measure-rests, David Sumbler, 2018/06/15
- Re: Form of multi-measure-rests, Simon Albrecht, 2018/06/15
- Re: Form of multi-measure-rests, David Sumbler, 2018/06/15
- Re: Form of multi-measure-rests, Simon Albrecht, 2018/06/15
- Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests, David Sumbler, 2018/06/15
- Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests, David Kastrup, 2018/06/15
- Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests, Karlin High, 2018/06/15
- Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests, Aaron Hill, 2018/06/15