lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fixed vertical spacing within staff-group


From: Eby Mani
Subject: Re: fixed vertical spacing within staff-group
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:43:49 +0000 (UTC)

Hi Malte, the reason why i did not include the minimal working(4 to 10 
measures), is the output looks good, without spacing issues. I have tried your 
suggestion and it is not fixing the spacing issue. I will mail the full file, 
so that you can see the problem. Thanks.

--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 29/12/17, Malte Meyn <address@hidden> wrote:

 Subject: Re: fixed vertical spacing within staff-group
 To: address@hidden
 Date: Friday, 29 December, 2017, 5:21 PM
 
 
 
 Am 29.12.2017 um 05:30 schrieb Eby Mani:
 > Hi,
 > 
 > How to set fixed vertical spacing within
 staff-group ?.
 
 Hi,
 
 please always give a minimal
 working (and compilable) code example that 
 shows what you are doing currently.
 
 > I have tried the following in \layout {
 \context } section. Vertical spacing keep on varying if
 there are beams, ledger lines or cross-staff notation. Even
 tried with padding=#0. Without the StaffGrouper, spacing is
 somewhat ok(but i feel little more spacing is required),
 except the cross-staff part.
 > 
 > \override
 StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.padding = #2
 > \override
 StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.basic-distance =
 #6
 
 Have a look at http://joramberger.de/files/LilypondSpacing.pdf
 Because 
 you didn’t provide code, I
 cannot test, but I think, something like the 
 following might work:
 
 \override
 StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.padding = #-inf.0
 \override
 StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.stretchability = 0
 \override
 StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.basic-distance = 10
 \override
 StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.minimum-distance = 10
 
 _______________________________________________
 lilypond-user mailing list
 address@hidden
 https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]