|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | Re: And now for something completely different. |
Date: | Sat, 02 Nov 2013 06:42:52 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to >> convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert. > > Nice. How did you come by this one? Accidentally. The weird thing is that I then tried using the file name lines.ly instead. Turns out that those are pretty much the only two more or less "ordinary" words afflicted. -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |