|
From: | Peter Bjuhr |
Subject: | Re: merging notes |
Date: | Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:57:05 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 |
On 09/06/2013 11:06 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
Sorry if I stated the obvious! I interpreted your question wrongly. I don't know enough of the documentation system to defend it. Maybe someone else can answer this!?Yes, I know.But it's assumed in the text.Hmm, where is that assumption stated? This is simply non-obvious and confusing that in some examples one cannot copy the visibly code and get the shown result.
I revised my answer now in the morning, hope you have seen it. An e2 shouldn't look like an e4, I agree!In what way isn't it a bug when an e2 looks like an e4. If I really wanted a half note to look like a quater note I'd use e4*2, then it is obvious in the code that I do something "unusual". Yes, and The half note and eighth note at the start of the second measure are incorrectly merged because the automatic merge cannot successfully complete the merge when three or more notes line up in the same note column, and in this case the merged note head is incorrect. after the third example confirms that "failing". When writing ly-files, such "failings" would be very hard to spot.
But I still don't think it is a bug. If you use /oneVoice in this way you have accept some additional fixing, which is also documented below.
Best Peter
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |