[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Hushing up Sibelius news? |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Feb 2013 01:33:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hilary Snaden <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2013-02-21 23:10, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> However, LilyPond indeed has a weakness in as far as it does not
>> really have a "file format". It is an evolving input language.
>
> If that's a "weakness", it's one I'm happy to see maintained
> indefinitely.
Well, it is not going away since the primary generator of LilyPond files
are humans rather than programs. As opposed to a "file format",
however, the only reliable reader (not just interpreter) of LilyPond
files is LilyPond itself. That's a disadvantage for interfacing with
other programs.
--
David Kastrup
- Hushing up Sibelius news?, Urs Liska, 2013/02/21
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Johan Vromans, 2013/02/21
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Hilary Snaden, 2013/02/21
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/21
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Shane Brandes, 2013/02/21
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Hilary Snaden, 2013/02/21
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Stefaan Himpe, 2013/02/24
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Olivier Biot, 2013/02/24
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Richard Shann, 2013/02/24
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Olivier Biot, 2013/02/24
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/02/22
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2013/02/22
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/02/22
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2013/02/23
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Urs Liska, 2013/02/23
Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Adam Spiers, 2013/02/25