|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Guide to Writing Orchestral Scores with Lilypond????? |
Date: | Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:01:23 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Am 16.01.2013 00:01, schrieb Antonio Gervasoni:
If you are going to do the switch, you will work on your own 'branch' (branching is maybe Git's killer feature I didn't tell you about so far ...). That means your source code is somewhat separate from the 'master' branch, but anybody who wants can see it. Well, the PDF wouldn't (couldn't) be _really_ hidden. Anybody can access the source code and can therefore compile it to a PDF - provided he/she has the appropriate LaTeX infrastructure available. But we just wouldn't publish the PDF on our own. In effect this would mean that your work isn't at a prominent place, but visible to anybody who cares.Joseph wrote:You're preaching to the converted here, I fear ... :-)Very true!!!! :-PWill you be publicly sharing your drafts? I'm sure people would be happy to give feedback and contributions on the way.Urs has almost convinced me about using Git so i't's very likely I will get a Github account and start collaborating directly with his project. According to him my "source code would be public this way right from the beginning. But the tutorial itself (in its PDF representation) would be hidden as long as [I] wish."
Best Urs
Regards, Antonio -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Guide-to-Writing-Orchestral-Scores-with-Lilypond-tp139065p139609.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |