[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Funny Bug or feature?. instrumentNames rendered in reverse order tha
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: Funny Bug or feature?. instrumentNames rendered in reverse order than |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:55:46 +0200 |
2010/10/8 Roman Stawski <address@hidden>:
>> The natural question is "how do I make sure that the counter is evaluated
>> during parsing?"
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-10/msg00144.html
When comparing both pieces of Scheme code it looks clear that the code
itself ensures this. From my little Scheme knowledge I'd say that the
score itself takes care of the counter and it is passed as an argument
to the function. This way, the counter can only be incremented in
parsing order. I could be wrong.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Funny Bug or feature?. instrumentNames rendered in reverse order than,
Francisco Vila <=