[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: elegant compound time signatures
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: elegant compound time signatures |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:04:13 -0700 |
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:41:22 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> wrote:
> So (being more positive) do you or anyone have a real example
> when #(override-beam...) stuff is essential, i.e., when
> beamGrouping doesn't work? That would be a useful addition
> to the manual, or alternatively it might suggest
> #(override-beam...) could be played down.
Well, beamGrouping deals with beatLength. If you wanted to set up
a beaming rule that only affected other durations, you'd need to
use #(override-beam...)
Hmm... say, 3/4 time? beatLength would be 4. You could manually
set that to 8 for some reason, and set beamGrouping to (6), but
still want to end 16th note beams at every quarter. You'd then
need override-beam.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, (continued)
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, Graham Percival, 2008/10/20
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, Hans Aberg, 2008/10/20
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, Graham Percival, 2008/10/20
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, Hans Aberg, 2008/10/20
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, Graham Percival, 2008/10/20
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, Hans Aberg, 2008/10/20
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, Graham Percival, 2008/10/20
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, Hans Aberg, 2008/10/20
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, Hans Aberg, 2008/10/20
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, Trevor Daniels, 2008/10/20
- Re: elegant compound time signatures,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: elegant compound time signatures, Hans Aberg, 2008/10/20