[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unusual Alto Clef
From: |
Alexander Kobel |
Subject: |
Re: unusual Alto Clef |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:20:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914) |
Eyolf Østrem wrote:
> I suppose this thread brings up the issue of styles: since the mentioned
> clef is not really a new SIGN just a different GLYPH, are there other such
> signs that we want?
The one I stumbled across some while ago is an alternate D'al Segno
glyph, depicted here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=659
(It is marked as Enhancement, which probably fits better than Defect,
right?)
This one has the benefit that it's written much clef-like in the staff
and thus spares vertical space; on the other hand, it will probably
require some more work than "just" drawing a glyph. I don't think such a
positioning is currently supported by any (Rehearsal_?)mark_engraver...
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, (continued)
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, Jonathan Kulp, 2008/10/09
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, David Bobroff, 2008/10/09
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, plutek-infinity, 2008/10/09
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, Eyolf Østrem, 2008/10/09
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, David Bobroff, 2008/10/09
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, Eyolf Østrem, 2008/10/09
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, Anthony W. Youngman, 2008/10/09
- Re: unusual Alto Clef,
Alexander Kobel <=
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/10/09
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, Alexander Kobel, 2008/10/09
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/10/10
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/10/09
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, David Bobroff, 2008/10/09
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, David Bobroff, 2008/10/10
- Re: unusual Alto Clef, Jonathan Kulp, 2008/10/09