Re: GDP: \articulation and -\articulation

[Patrick McCarty]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:

>  Interesting!  However, as this example indicates, it's not
>  specific to articulations.  We'll add info to LM 3 and
>  NR 3 about this.
>
>  Since there's nothing specific about articulations here, we'll
>  remove it from NR 1.3.

Just to be clear about this:

-- In NR 1.3, we will only be explaining the \ syntax for
articulations and ornamentations.
-- The - syntax will only be explained for the `shorthands'

Is this correct?

Thanks,
Patrick