[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: beginning-of-measure padding value?
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: beginning-of-measure padding value? |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:15:48 -0400 |
Han-Wen (et al.): Thanks for 2.11.28!
Joe: Thanks for the spacing fixes, which have appeared in 2.11.28 --
things look *so* much better now (in particular, I've been testing
initial accidentals and arpeggios), and I've been able to extract my
(incredibly numerous) tweaks!
Final (?) note/tip on this: if anyone else finds Lilypond's default
beginning-of-measure spacing too small in general (i.e., even without
"modifiers" like accidentals and arpeggios), you can add a little
more space using:
\override BarLine #'space-alist #'next-note = #'(semi-fixed-
space . 1.8)
Of course, adjust the numeric value as you see fit.
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
p.s. On a side-note, can anyone explain to me the difference between
"first-note" and "next-note" in the BarLine space-alist?