[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: partcombine for three parts?
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: |
Re: partcombine for three parts? |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:39:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20060628 Debian/1.7.8-1sarge7.1 |
As has already been mentioned, the current implementation
of partcombine has several problems and limitations and
there are plans to rewrite it completely. Therefore, none
of the main hackers has any interest in tweaking the current
implementation any more, so unless you want to do the
modifications yourself I'm afraid you have to wait for the
new partcombine to appear some time in the future.
I hope you have tried to simply put the three lines of
music into the same Voice context.
/Mats
Ted Walther wrote:
Does \partcombine yield a music expression? I tried doing this:
\partcombine \partcombine \foo \bar \baz
The results were ugly. Lilypond complained a lot too.
warning: ignoring too many clashing note columns
The reason I ask is that Sacred Harp music from the Denson book has
three voices together in the treble clef and only one in the bass. I
want to keep each voice separate, but I like the type of output that
partcombine produces for two voices. How hard would it be to extend it
to work with three? Or four?
Ted
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: address@hidden
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================