[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Font problems in 2.3.24
From: |
Alexandre Beneteau |
Subject: |
Re: Font problems in 2.3.24 |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Oct 2004 13:53:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041007 Debian/1.7.3-5 |
Thanks for your reply,
I have no problem with missfonts (anyway kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa returns
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa)
Xdvi runs fine with dvi generated by lily ; but gv displays strange symbols for
graces notes and fermata on bar.
Anyway, I dug a little more and I can get good postscript and pdf files starting
with the dvi produced by lily using :
dvips -f -Z flute.dvi > flute.ps
This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2004.10.30:1258' ->
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta20
dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta26
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta26
dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta13
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta13
dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta14
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta14
<texc.pro><music-drawing-routines.ps><special.pro>. [1] [2] [3] [4]
As you can see, there are still problems (even after having deleted the font
caches), but the output is correctly displayed by gv (?)
I'm still using Pedro's packages of lilypond-2.3.24...
Hoping this will help to track the problem,
Thanks,
Alex.
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
address@hidden writes:
Thanks for your reply. I've just had a closer look at a few things, and
I found a log file named missfont.log in my project directory, which
contains the line
mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000 --dpi 8000 ecrm1000
Does this give any clues as to the problem?
yes - I suspect that the font package is installed incorrectly.
over here I have
byrd:~/usr/src/lilypond$ kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa
what does kpsewhich say?