[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:36:56 +0000 (UTC) |
> Note that I personally haven’t objected to declaring LuaTeX
> supported. I do object to keeping XeTeX in that case.
To clarify what Jean wants if he mentions 'maintenance burden': We are
talking about a potential change checking for all three TeX variants
in the `configure` script, or rather, what TeX versions should be
tested against.
The patch for such a decision is trivial. It doesn't mean that it
would no longer be possible to build the documentation for a given TeX
flavour, it is just that `xetex` (or `pdftex`) would be no longer in
the toolchain for CI and building the final version of the
documentation.
Werner
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, (continued)
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation,Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/28
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Hans Åberg, 2022/11/23
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation,
Werner LEMBERG <=
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21