|
From: | Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: | Re: Should we be touching goops? |
Date: | Sun, 5 Jun 2022 14:20:35 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 |
Le 05/06/2022 à 14:13, David Kastrup a écrit :
git grep 'ly:moment-\(add\|sub\|mul\|div\|mod\)' puts out a good page or so, much of it in articulate.ly and swing.ly. Admittedly, both of those files are of the kind we would want to encourage people to write, and that kind of change makes it more convenient.
Sorry, my 'something' was meant to refer to introducing a distinction between time points and time spans. (Like you) I'm not convinced by the benefits of doing that compared to all the churn of converting the code base and asking users to convert their own Scheme code: I am not seeing operations on moments that have no 'physical' meaning being a significant source of actual bugs in our tracker (or a source of any bugs at all). Independently, I have not understood how this topic relates to the original topic of this thread, namely spelling operations of Moment and possibly other types with standard + - * / overloaded via GOOPS rather than via dedicated functions. Jean
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |