[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries
From: |
Jacques Menu |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:04:03 +0200 |
Hello,
Starting yesterday, I ‘m now running LilyPond 2.20.0 on a Apple mini M1
running under Big Sur 11.2.3.
I can contribute to building Mac OS versions on my machine.
For my own work, I use AppVeyor, as has been setup by Grame’s Dom Fober, to
build installable Mac OS versions. Is that something that could help solve this
issue?
JM
> Le 22 avr. 2021 à 20:16, Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@byu.edu> a écrit :
>
> Marnen,
>
> This is a response to an email from more than a year ago. Our situation
> hasn’t improved since then, even though you did all your great work.
>
> What do you think it would take to make this bundle part of the core project?
>
> I agree with you that it should be part of our core. But it doesn’t match up
> with our current build process, because it cannot be done on non-Apple
> hardware.
>
> I see from some old emails that you envision some sort of CI that builds an
> app bundle. It would need to have access to Apple hardware to do that, IIUC.
> Do you have thoughts about how we would get access to that Apple hardware?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carl
>
>
> From: Marnen Laibow-Koser <marnen@marnen.org <mailto:marnen@marnen.org>>
> Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 2:18 PM
> To: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@byu.edu <mailto:c_sorensen@byu.edu>>
> Cc: LilyPond Users <lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>>,
> Moritz Heffter <mxordn@me.com <mailto:mxordn@me.com>>
> Subject: Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:49 PM Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@byu.edu
> <mailto:c_sorensen@byu.edu>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Marnen Laibow-Koser <marnen@marnen.org <mailto:marnen@marnen.org>>
>> Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 11:07 AM
>> To: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@byu.edu <mailto:c_sorensen@byu.edu>>
>> Cc: LilyPond Users <lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>>,
>> Moritz Heffter <mxordn@me.com <mailto:mxordn@me.com>>
>> Subject: Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:02 PM Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@byu.edu
>> <mailto:c_sorensen@byu.edu>> wrote:
>>> I note that Moritz mentions he gets the same results from the MacPorts
>>> build. Perhaps the MacPorts people could provide some insight.
>>
>> Hmm. I wonder if I should try using a more recent version of Mac OS and
>> Xcode on the build box. I was using the oldest possible version in order to
>> produce the most backward-compatible build.
>>
>> But...if this is a general issue with Catalina, why are so few users
>> affected by it, and why are users on Mojave among those affected?
>>
>> I don’t think it’s a general issue. I think it’s a specific issue, that
>> varies from machine to machine. My only suggestion was that perhaps
>> somebody in the MacPorts group might be able to provide some debugging
>> helps. Hopefully the issue is the same in MacPorts as in your app bundle,
>> so if it can be resolved in MacPorts it can be resolved in the app bundle….
>
> Yeah, that might be a good point. I think this is the first time we've seen
> a MacPorts build have this same problem.
>
> Also: it's not *my* bundle, except in that I figured out the process to build
> it. Ideally, it is the LilyPond project's bundle: I want this to be accepted
> into the core project, not remain my own personal thing.
>
>>
>> Carl
>
> Best,
> --
> Marnen Laibow-Koser
> marnen@marnen.org <mailto:marnen@marnen.org>
> http://www.marnen.org <http://www.marnen.org/>