[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:36:30 -0500 |
On Jan 14, 2021, at 19:13, Dan Eble <dan@faithful.be> wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2021, at 18:33, Dan Eble <dan@faithful.be> wrote:
>>
>> Alas, all is not well with earlier versions. Consider the confusing bar
>> numbers in the following elaboration of your example. How would you resolve
>> it?
>
> My thoughts:
>
> Measure 1 is complete, so the first "2" is not incorrect, though it might not
> be what a user expects.
>
> No measure can start twice.
>
> The second "2" should either be "(2)", or it should be "3" and the "3" should
> be "4".
Add issue #3640 to this discussion. Accidentals, bar numbers, and (now)
multi-measure rests are all impacted by the fact that \bar "|" does not create
a new measure.
\new Score \with {
barNumberVisibility = #(every-nth-bar-number-visible 1)
\override BarNumber.break-visibility = #all-visible
} {
f'1
\cadenzaOn
bes2
\cadenzaOff
%\partial 1024 s1024 %<<< try this
\bar "|"
<< R1 bes1 >>
}
I don't think that merely restoring the previous behavior of
Multi_measure_rest_engraver would be the right thing to do, because acting as
if a measure begins at \bar "|" is inconsistent with other engravers.
—
Dan
- cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Thomas Morley, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/17
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Thomas Morley, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/15