[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tie over clef change
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
Re: tie over clef change |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:38:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
Le 27/09/2020 à 05:24, Andrew Bernard a écrit :
That can't be a tie because the second note would not have the
accidental, in general.
What do you mean? Currently { cis'1~ cis' } produces a Tie object.
Best,
Jean
- Re: tie over clef change, (continued)
- Re: tie over clef change, Kevin Barry, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/28
- Re: tie over clef change, David Kastrup, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Aaron Hill, 2020/09/26
Re: tie over clef change, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/26
Re: tie over clef change, Andrew Bernard, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change,
Jean Abou Samra <=
Re: tie over clef change, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/26
Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26
Re: tie over clef change, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/27