[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branching stable/2.22?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: branching stable/2.22? |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:05:13 +0200 |
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:17 PM Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> wrote:
> > I think the stabilization effort could be a joint effort by the entire
> > dev team, by agreeing with the team to hold off on new features and
> > invasive changes for a period of time (say, 1 to 2 months).
>
> My feeling is that we should prioritize on bug fixes, but not actively
> block the development of features.
Right - but we should refrain from changes that will make the
backporting process more difficult, so it is still a freeze of sorts.
> Jonas
>
> > BTW- aside from GUILE 2 and Python 3 support, I think users will also
> > be happy with the speedups that I've been working on in this cycle.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwenn@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, (continued)
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/08/25
- Message not available
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/08/25
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Carl Sorensen, 2020/08/25
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Dan Eble, 2020/08/25
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Kevin Barry, 2020/08/25
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/08/25
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, David Kastrup, 2020/08/25
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/08/25
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/08/25
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/08/25
- Re: branching stable/2.22?,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
Fwd: branching stable/2.22?, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/08/25