[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18 |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jul 2020 11:17:24 +0200 |
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 4:29 AM Owen Lamb <owendlamb@gmail.com> wrote:
> (I also made a couple new scheme properties for a notehead grob:
> stem-attachment-up and stem-attachment-down. At the moment, the old,
> generic stem-attachment property simply calls for the -up or -down variant
> depending on the grob's direction, but it may be wise to always make it
> return stem-attachment-up, to preserve backwards compatibility.
> Perhaps--although this is beyond my Scheme expertise--"setting"
> stem-attachment should set stem-attachment-up, while setting
> stem-attachment-down to an appropriate reflection as well? What do you all
> think?)
I don't understand why we need 2 properties here. What benefit do we
get relative to a single property?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwenn@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- GSoC 2020 update, July 18, Owen Lamb, 2020/07/18
- Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18, Karlin High, 2020/07/18
- Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18, Owen Lamb, 2020/07/20
- Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18, Benkő Pál, 2020/07/21
- Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/07/21
- Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2020/07/21
- Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18, Benkő Pál, 2020/07/21
- Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18, Owen Lamb, 2020/07/21
- Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18, Benkő Pál, 2020/07/22
- Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18, Owen Lamb, 2020/07/22
Re: GSoC 2020 update, July 18, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/07/20